Ex parte BAY - Page 11




                     Appeal No. 1999-1153                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/324,549                                                                                                                                            


                     in view of Jacobs.                     6                                                                                                                          











                                                                                  DECISION                                                                                             
                                The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-12 and                                                                                                
                     15-19 over Phillion, Rajeswari, CA ‘979 or CA ‘801, and claims                                                                                                    
                     21-37 over Gizycki in view of Jacobs, are reversed.                                                                                                               
                                                                                  REVERSED                                                                                             




                                                                                                                      )                                                                
                                                     TERRY J. OWENS                                                   )                                                                
                                                     Administrative Patent Judge                                      )                                                                
                                                                                                                      )                                                                
                                                                                                                      )                                                                

                                6 Jacobs is relied upon by the examiner (answer, page 6)                                                                                               
                     only for a suggestion of reacting the product of the                                                                                                              
                     appellant’s claim 21 with an isocyanate-reactive material as                                                                                                      
                     recited in the appellant’s dependent claims 31-33, and not for                                                                                                    
                     a disclosure which remedies the above-discussed deficiency in                                                                                                     
                     Gizycki.                                                                                                                                                          
                                                                                         11                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007