The opinion in support of the decision being entered today: (1) was not written for publication in a law journal;
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BERNARD CADET
____________
Appeal 1999-1286
Application 08/567,9501
____________
HEARD: February 20, 2002
____________
Before: LIEBERMAN, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of a primary examiner rejecting claims 1–6 and
16–23. Claims 7–15 have been withdrawn from consideration and are not on appeal.
We affirm in part.
1 Application for patent filed December 6, 1995. Appellant claim the benefit of priority under 35
U.S.C. § 119 based on French application no. 94-15151, filed December 9, 1994. According to Appellant, the
real party in interest is STMicroelectronics, S.A., of France. (Brief at 1.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007