Ex Parte BAUMGARTNER - Page 1


                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                 Paper No. 43                 
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                                   Ex parte WERNER A. BAUMGARTNER                                             
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 1999-1337                                              
                                         Application No. 08/393,232                                           
                                                __________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                    
                Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ADAMS, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.                      
                ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                         
                examiner’s final rejection of claims 35-42 and 47-49, which are all the claims                
                pending in the application.                                                                   
                      Claim 47 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced              
                below:                                                                                        
                      47.    A method for the detection of marijuana intake by an individual                  
                             which comprises:                                                                 
                             (a)   chemically treating a sample of hair from the individual in a              
                                   manner that releases into solution an analyte characteristic               
                                   of marijuana intake if present in the hair sample and an                   
                                   interfering substance that may interfer with a marijuana                   
                                   immunoassay;                                                               









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007