Appeal No. 1999-1625
Application No. 08/792,468
standing or falling together as a group, and we will treat claim
13 as a representative claim of that group. We will, thereby,
consider Appellants' claims 27, 30 and 32 through 34 as standing
or falling together, and we will treat claim 27 as a
representative claim of that group. We also note that Appellants
have argued claims 35 and 36 as a single group. See page 5,
lines 1 and 2 of the brief. We will, thereby, consider
Appellants' claims 35 and 36 as standing or falling together, and
we will treat claim 35 as a representative claim of that group.
Finally, we note that Appellants have argued claims 24 through 26
as a single group. See page 4, lines 18 and 19 of the brief. We
will, thereby, consider Appellants' claims 24 through 26 as
standing or falling together, and we will treat claim 24 as a
representative claim of that group.
Appellants argue that Collins does not teach or suggest that
"a commodity code reading section, a prepaid card inputting
processing section, a commodity price retrieval section and a
data updating section are permanently fixed to a transportable
accommodation section" recited in claim 13. See page 6, lines
13-18 of the brief. Appellants do not disagree that Collins
reads on commodity code reading, purchasing structure or a
transporting accommodation section. See page 6, lines 1-12 of
66
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007