Ex Parte TRAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-1888                                                        
          Application No. 08/473,504                                                  


          read operation associated with an instruction is performed prior            
          to the instruction arriving at the functional unit which forms              
          the execute stage of the instruction processing pipeline, thereby           
          reducing the number of clock cycles required by the functional              
          unit.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it             
          reads as follows:                                                           
          1.   A method for predicting a data address which will be                   
          referenced by a plurality of instructions residing in a basic               
          block when said basic block is fetched, comprising:                         
               generating a data prediction address;                                  
               fetching data associated with said data prediction address             
                    from a data cache into a data buffer; and                         
               accessing said data buffer for load data from a decode stage           
                    of an instruction processing pipeline.                            

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Eickemeyer (Eickemeyer I)          5,313,634      May  17, 1994             
          Eickemeyer et al. (Eickemeyer II) 5,377,336       Dec. 27, 1994             
          Kusano                             5,412,786      May  02, 1995             
               Claims 1 through 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
          being unpatentable over Eickemeyer II.                                      
               Claims 5 through 14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Eickemeyer II in view of                   
          Eickemeyer I.                                                               
               Claims 17 through 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as           
          being unpatentable over Eickemeyer I in view of Eickemeyer II.              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007