Appeal No. 1999-2226 Page 9
Application No. 08/582,678
accept the Examiner’s apparent position that it would have been prima facie obvious to secure
the templates to the tray in Murphy by flowing plastic around same.
In light of the foregoing, we cannot sustain the Examiner’s § 103 rejection of claim 7.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-6, 8-10, 20 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
over Murphy in view of AAPA is affirmed. The decision of the Examiner to reject claim 7 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BRG/tdl
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007