The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YUTAKA NAKATSU, SHIN IIMA, KAYOKO OHYOSHI,
and TOMOMI NAKAMURA
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2345
Application No. 08/610,758
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before RUGGIERO, LALL, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-7, which are all the claims in the application.
We affirm.
1 Appellants waived oral hearing; see fax communication filed July 2, 2001.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007