Ex Parte BUTTER et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1999-2449                                                        
          Application No. 08/745,584                                 Page 2           

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant's invention relates to flexible motion estimation            
          architecture.  An understanding of the invention can be derived             
          from a reading of exemplary claims 1 and 15, which are reproduced           
          as follows:                                                                 
               1.  A method of temporal compression of a digital video data           
          stream, comprising the steps of:                                            
          hierarchically searching in at least one hierarchical search unit           
          for pixels in a reference picture to find a best match macroblock           
          therein corresponding to a current macroblock;                              
          constructing a motion vector of offset between the best match               
          macroblock and the current macroblock;                                      
          passing the motion vector from the at least one hierarchial                 
          search unit to a refinement search unit; and                                
          performing a refinement search around the offset of the best                
          match macroblock.                                                           
               15.  A search processor for digital video motion estimation,           
          said search processor comprising:                                           
          a hierarchical search unit; and                                             
          a refinement search unit connected to the hierarchical search               
          unit via a best match diff/offset bus.                                      
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Gonzales et al (Gonzales)     5,414,469        May 9, 1995                  
          Kopet et al (Kopet)           5,448,310      Sep. 5, 1995                   
          Greenfield et al (Greenfield)  5,526,054     Jun. 11, 1996                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007