The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SATISH KUMAR GAGGAR and FUH-SHENG CHEN
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-2488
Application No. 08/841,027
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claim 10 and from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 2-
71 and 9 as amended subsequent to the final rejection. These are
all of the claims remaining in the application.
1We observe that the phrase “said vinyl aromatic-vinyl
cyanide rigid copolymer” in claim 6 lacks strict antecedent basis
and apparently should read –-said vinyl aromatic-unsaturated
nitrile rigid resin–-. This informality is deserving of
correction in any further prosecution that may occur.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007