Ex parte KOCH - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1999-2492                                                                                     Page 3                        
                 Application No. 08/801,676                                                                                                             


                 Societe Europeenne De Propulsion (FR 2,303,843 ), French                           1                                                   
                 Published Patent Application No. 2,303,843, Oct. 08, 1976.                                                                             

                          Claims 1-5, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                        
                 103 as being unpatentable over Schubert in view of FR                                                                                  
                 2,303,843, either of White or Iwasa, and alleged admitted                                                                              
                 prior art.   Claims 1-5, 14 and 15 also stand rejected under2                                                                                                                    
                 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Geyer in view of                                                                            
                 Ruggeri, further in view of FR 2,303,843, either of White or                                                                           
                 Iwasa, and the alleged admitted prior art.  Claims 10-13 stand                                                                         
                 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over FR                                                                           
                 2,303,843 in view of White or Iwasa, and the alleged admitted                                                                          
                 prior art.                                                                                                                             
                          We refer to appellant’s brief and reply brief and to the                                                                      
                 examiner’s answer for an exposition of the respective                                                                                  




                          1All references to FR 2,376,666 in this decision are to                                                                       
                 the English language translation of record.                                                                                            
                          2While the source of the alleged prior art admission is                                                                       
                 not repeated in the answer, the examiner refers to appellant’s                                                                         
                 specification at page 4, line 15 through page 5, line 36, page                                                                         
                 6, line 4 through page 7, line 5 and page 9, line 33 through                                                                           
                 page 12, line 11 at page 3 of the final rejection mailed June                                                                          
                 22, 1998 as representing admitted prior art.                                                                                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007