The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte WILFROED HATKE, FRANK OSAN, OTTO HERRMANN-SCHONHERR, VINCENT J. SULLIVAN, and THOMAS WELLER __________ Appeal No. 1999-2507 Application No. 08/967,367 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before GARRIS, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 9 through 14 and 16 through 23 in the above-identified application. Claims 15 and 24 through 28, which are the only other pending claims, have been indicated as allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. (Examiner's answer, page 2.) The subject matter on appeal relates to a polymer alloy.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007