Ex Parte HATKE et al - Page 1




         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
         not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
         Board.                                                                      
                                                              Paper No. 27           

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    __________                                       
                              Ex parte WILFROED HATKE,                               
                                    FRANK OSAN,                                      
                              OTTO HERRMANN-SCHONHERR,                               
                                VINCENT J. SULLIVAN,                                 
                                        and                                          
                                   THOMAS WELLER                                     
                                    __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2507                                 
                             Application No. 08/967,367                              
                                    ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                       
                                    ___________                                      
         Before GARRIS, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.            
         DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
         the examiner’s final rejection of claims 9 through 14 and 16                
         through 23 in the above-identified application.  Claims 15 and              
         24 through 28, which are the only other pending claims, have                
         been indicated as allowable if rewritten in independent form                
         including all of the limitations of the base claim and any                  


         intervening claims.  (Examiner's answer, page 2.)                           
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a polymer alloy.              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007