The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GREGORY KOZLOWSKI and CHARLES E. OBERLY ____________ Appeal No. 1999-2595 Application No. 08/927,106 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before OWENS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 3 through 6, 19, 21 and 22 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated Aug. 3, 1998, Paper No. 17, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Aug. 6, 1998, Paper No. 18). Claims 1, 3-6, 19, 21 and 22 are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellants, the invention is directed to a neodymium gallate (NGO) surface layer on a nickel sheath which actsPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007