Appeal No. 1999-2605
Application No. 08/788,669
In conclusion, since the Examiner has not established a
prima facie case of obviousness, the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
independent claims 1 and 7, as well as claims 2-6, 8-11, 17, and
18 dependent thereon, is not sustained. Therefore, the decision
of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-11, 17, and 18 is reversed.
REVERSED
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007