The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 28 Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel Box Interference Filed: February 28, 2002 Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ RICHARD P. HAUGLAND and WOJCIECH SZALECKI Junior Party, (Application 09/129,015), v. CLARENCE N. AHLEM and STEVEN M. TORKELSON Senior Party (Patent 5,955,612). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,669 _______________ Before: SCHAFER, MEDLEY and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGEMENT (Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662) Senior Party Ahlem et al. has conceded priority to the count and requested adverse judgement. (Paper No. 27). Upon consideration of the record, it is: ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 and Count 2 (Notice Declaring Interference, Paper No. 1, pages 5-6), is awarded against Senior Party Ahlem et al.Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007