HAUGLAND et al v. AHLEM et al - Page 2

                        FURTHER ORDERED that Senior Party Ahlem et al. is not entitled to a patent                                       
                containing claims 1-2 and 4-5 of Ahlem et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,955,612.                                                
                        FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a                                   
                paper number in the file of Haugland et al., U.S. Application No. 09/129,015 and Ahlem et al.,                           
                U.S. Patent No. 5,955,612.                                                                                               
                        FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to                                
                35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.1                                                                                  


                                        RICHARD E. SCHAFER                      )                                                        
                                        Administrative Patent Judge             )                                                        
                                                                                )                                                        
                                                                                )                                                        
                                                                                )                                                        
                                                                                )       BOARD OF PATENT                                  
                                        SALLY C. MEDLEY                         )       APPEALS                                          
                                        Administrative Patent Judge             )       AND                                              
                                                                                )       INTERFERENCES                                    
                                                                                )                                                        
                                                                                )                                                        
                                        MICHAEL P. TIERNEY                      )                                                        
                                        Administrative Patent Judge             )                                                        











                        1We note that a Settlement Agreement was filed with the Board.  (Paper No. 19).  The                             
                Board does not review the Settlement Agreement for purposes of compliance with 35 U.S.C.                                 
                § 135(c).  Specifically, it is the parties responsibility to ensure that the provisions of 35 U.S.C.                     
                § 135(c) have been complied with.                                                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007