The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LARRY O. JUNDT
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0396
Application No. 08/527,886
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 23 and 48 through 73. In the
Examiner's Answer (page 4) the examiner withdraws the rejection
of claims 1 through 23 and 48 through 73 as being based upon a
defective reissue declaration and of claims 9 through 14, 17, 23,
52 through 60, 69, and 70 as being obvious over Cromwell.
Accordingly, all rejections of claims 1 through 23 have been
withdrawn, and only claims 48 through 73 remain before us on
appeal.
Appellant's invention relates to a process control terminal
which displays process control function information and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007