The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte ASHOK CHAURUSHIA, STEVE ODABASHIAN,
ARNOLD COMPRONI and JORGE MILLAN
Appeal No. 2000-0496
Application No. 08/795,626
ON BRIEF
Before OWENS, DELMENDO, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the refusal to allow claims 3-7 and
10 as amended after final rejection.1 These are all of the
claims remaining in the application.
1 The examiner has indicated (advisory action mailed
April 15, 1999, paper no. 19) that the appellants’ amendment to
claim 10 after final rejection (filed April 7, 1999, paper
no. 18) would be entered upon filing an appeal. Consequently, we
consider the claim in its form in this amendment. The examiner
has not had this amendment clerically entered, and should do so.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007