The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KALYAN GANESAN and ENRIQUE LABORDE ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0612 Application No. 08/583,357 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3 through 17, 19, and 20, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants' invention relates to a personal access communications system for implementing full two way voice and data service in a voice service area and two way messaging in areas outside the voice service area. Claims 13 and 16 are illustrative of the claimed invention, and they read as follows: 13. A wide area wireless personal communication system incorporating advanced messaging capability comprising:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007