Appeal No. 2000-0612 Application No. 08/583,357 and the claims which depend therefrom. Consequently, we cannot sustain the rejection of claims 16, 17, 19, and 20. CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 3 through 17, 19, and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APJ/tdl 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007