Ex Parte BLALOCK et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 23              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                      Ex parte GUY BLALOCK and GURTEJ S. SANDHU                       
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-1003                                  
                             Application No. 08/631,465                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
          Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of            
          claims 1, 2 and 4-34 which are all of the claims remaining in the           
          application.                                                                
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a method and                   
          apparatus for film deposition which comprises at least one                  
          secondary ionization zone.  Further details of this appealed                
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007