The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 37 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOHRU OGAWA ____________ Appeal No.2000-1112 Application No. 08/518,363 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRETT, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 59, 62 through 64, and 68. Claims 2 through 58 have been canceled. Claims 60, 61, 66, 67, and 69 through 71 have been allowed. 1 Appellant's invention relates to a method and apparatus for forming a pattern on a substrate, the method including the use of a phase shifting mask. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1 We note that although claim 65 was neither canceled nor indicated as allowable, it has not been rejected and, therefore, is not before us on appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007