Ex Parte STEPP et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1363                                                        
          Application No. 08/848,374                                                  


               5.   A computerized system comprising:                                 
               a non-volatile memory storing a plurality of configuration             
          settings;                                                                   
               a modification component operatively coupled to the memory             
          to permit changes to be made to the configuration settings; and,            
               a recordation component operatively coupled to the memory to           
          maintain a chronologically ordered history file of changes                  
          previously made to the configuration settings.                              
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Harada et al. (Harada)        5,497,490           Mar. 05, 1996             
          ASUS, PVI-486AP4 User's Manual, 1994, pp. 1-1 to 1-13 and 3-1 to            
          3-35.                                                                       
               Claims 1 through 19 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 as being unpatentable over ASUS in view of Harada.                    
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 15,              
          mailed February 11, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning             
          in support of the rejection, and to appellants' Brief (Paper                
          No. 14, filed December 6, 1999) for appellants' arguments                   
          thereagainst.                                                               
                                       OPINION                                        
               As a preliminary matter, we note that appellants, on page 5            
          of the Brief, indicate that the claims should stand or fall                 
          according to the following groups: (1) claims 1, 2, and 4,                  

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007