The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MATTHEW JOHN BICKERTON, KATHRYN ANN BOHRER,
EMMA SUZANNE HUGHES, EDWARD WILLIAM KENWORTHY,
RUPERT JEREMY MUSGROVE, LINDAMAY ROSE PATTERSON,
STEVEN PORTER, DAVID DENNIS SALT,
and DUNCAN KEITH SCATTERGOOD
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0024
Application No. 08/827,285
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before RUGGIERO, DIXON, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 3-9, 11-17, 19-25, 27-33,
and 35-41, which are all of the claims pending in this
application. Claims 1, 2, 10, 18, 26 and 34 have been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007