Appeal No. 2001-0300
Application 08/819,527
rejection, and to the amended appeal brief (Paper No. 24) (pages
referred to as "Br__") and reply brief (Paper No. 26) for a
statement of appellant's arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
Notes
On page 4, line 25, of the specification, it appears that
the equation "P = 2 sinN" should be "P = 2D sinN."
On page 5, lines 4-8, of the specification, it appears that
"31" on line 6 should be "62," the number of passes, and the
computed maximum wire diameter should be "0.002 inch" instead of
"0.004 inch" with the AWG adjusted accordingly. That is, if the
pitch is 0.124 inch and there are 62 passes with one wire being
laid down in the 0.124 inch pitch on each pass, the wire size
should be 0.124/62 = 0.002 inch. This appears to be an obvious
error that could be corrected without introducing new matter.
Claim 10 correctly states that "a diameter of said wire is
defined by said constant pitch divided by said number of passes
in one direction." The number of turns per pass, "31," is not
relevant to determining fill or wire diameter.
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007