Ex Parte EVANS et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-0319                                                        
          Application 09/005,841                                                      

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention relates to a capacitor structure which is                
          asymmetrical because it employs an anode and a cathode of                   
          different composition and structure.                                        
               Claim 23 is reproduced below.                                          
                    23.  A capacitor comprising:                                      
                    a cathode comprising a cathode coating including an               
               oxide of at least one metal selected from the group                    
               consisting of cobalt, molybdenum, and tungsten;                        
                    an anode spaced from the cathode coating, the anode               
               having a coating of an oxide of a metal selected from the              
               group consisting of tantalum, aluminum, niobium, zirconium,            
               and titanium; and                                                      
                    an electrolyte disposed between and in contact with the           
               cathode coating and the anode.                                         

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
               Hähn et al. (Hähn)       4,347,084      August 31, 1982                
               Ahmad et al. (Ahmad)     5,800,857    September 1, 1998                
          (§ 102(e) date September 30, 1996)                                          
               Claims 23, 24, 27-30, 34, and 35 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Ahmad.                           
               Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being             
          unpatentable over Ahmad and Hähn.                                           















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007