Ex Parte NIELSEN - Page 9




          Appeal No. 2001-0331                                       Page 9           
          Application No. 09/122,982                                                  


          other information can be attached to the message.  Pegasus                  
          teaches that any message and file may be sent to any other                  
          computer for any purpose.  The examiner asserts (answer, page 4)            
          that “[T]he present claims do not distinguish over the generic              
          use of this known software e-mail function for sending any file             
          attached to an e-mail message, where the operation can be loosely           
          characterized as having steps done “automatically.”  Netscape               
          teaches RSA encryption of all of its transmissions which include            
          file attachments with coding preferences, which include e-mail.             
          Netscape further teaches the ability of a firewall to be                    
          penetrated by e-mail.  It is asserted (id.) that it would have              
          been obvious to send an encrypted message or a copy of a file               
          from a source computer to another computer, and to consider any             
          backup computer as an escrow computer.  The examiner additionally           
          argues (answer, page 4) that:                                               
               Many programs periodically back-up data                                
               automatically, but that is not claimed, and alone                      
               it would read on some of the first Windows version’s                   
               of Word and Word Perfect.  Thus, it would have been                    
               obvious to have periodically executed back-up routines                 
               on some data manually, to the extent that the automatic                
               nature of some of its software functions are not of                    
               concern here.  To further e-mail such is within the                    
               realm of e-mailings per se found in the three                          
               references.                                                            
          Appellant asserts (brief, pages 5 and 6) that:                              








Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007