Ex Parte YU - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-0416                                                        
          Application No. 09/074,292                                                  


               Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal              
          and is reproduced below:                                                    
               1.  A method of manufacturing a semiconductor device                   
               having features with a dimension of ½ the minimum                      
               pitch, wherein the method comprises:                                   
                    forming a target layer of material on a partially                 
               completed semiconductor device, wherein the target                     
               layer of material is to be etched to a dimension of ½                  
               the minimum pitch;                                                     
                    a first etch process of the target layer of                       
               material with masks having a dimension of the minimum                  
               pitch; and                                                             
                    a second etch process of the target layer of                      
               material with the masks offset by a distance of ½ the                  
               minimum pitch.                                                         
               The references relied upon by the examiner are:                        
               Keyser                        4,484,978      Nov. 27, 1984             
               Lee et al. (Lee)              5,444,020      Aug. 22, 1995             

                                Grounds of Rejection                                  
               1. Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                
          second paragraph, as being indefinite.                                      
               2. Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
          unpatentable over Lee.                                                      
               3. Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                    
          unpatentable over Lee and further in view of Keyser.                        
               We reverse as to all three grounds of rejection.                       

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007