Appeal No. 2001-0628 Application No. 09/118,665 Knuttel, the examiner’s primary reference in this rejection, discloses “an electromagnet for generating the static magnetic field needed for NMR tomography [i.e., NMR imaging], with a coil arrangement that generates an approximately homogenous magnetic field in the internal space defined by said coil arrangement and in which the body to be examined is located” (translation, page 3). Figure 3 illustrates a horizontally disposed electromagnet 21 wherein a patient lies on a table 23 designed for movement into and out of the electromagnet, and Figures 4 and 5 depict vertically disposed electromagnets 31 and 45 adapted to be lowered over the upper body of a standing patient (Figure 4) or a sitting patient (Figure 5). Claims 59 through 68, 70, 71, 75, 77 through 80 and 88 through 91 recite methods wherein the patient is in either a seated or a standing orientation, or wherein the imaging unit has a chamber with an upright central axis. To meet these limitations, the examiner relies on the electromagnet embodiments shown in Figures 4 and 5 of the Knuttel reference. As implicitly conceded by the examiner (see pages 4 through 7 in the answer), however, these portions of the Knuttel disclosure do not respond to the limitations in independent claim 59, or the corresponding limitations in independent claims 64, 69 (from which claims 70 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007