Ex Parte GOODMAN et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2001-0769                                                                                                
               Application No. 09/237,791                                                                                          


                       b)     positioning said substrate fixture in a vapor deposition chamber having a vapor                      
                              generator, said substrate fixture being positioned at an oblique angle to said vapor                 
                              generator;                                                                                           
                       c)     introducing phosphor constituents into said vapor generator capable of forming a                     
                              vapor of said phosphor constituents;                                                                 
                       d)     placing said chamber under an inert atmosphere;                                                      

                       e)     activating said vapor generator to form an ingot pool of said phosphor constituents                  
                              and thereby generate said vapor of said phosphor constituents;                                       
                       f)     directing said vapor of said phosphor constituents towards said substrate fixture;                   
                       g)     maintaining a constant height of said ingot pool of said phosphor constituents in said               
                              vapor generator; and                                                                                 
                       h)     rotating said substrate fixture for a time sufficient to effect deposition of a phosphor             
                              complex on said imaging screen substrate to thereby form said anisotropic, auto-                     
                              collimating imaging screen.                                                                          
                                                           PRIOR ART                                                               
                       In support of his rejections, the examiner relies on the following prior art references:                    
               Blecherman et al. (Blecherman)                3,889,019              Jun. 10, 1975                                  
               Brixner et al. (Brixner)                      5,380,599              Jan. 10, 1995                                  
                                                                                                                                  
               Goodman et al. (Goodman)                      5,427,817              Jun. 27, 1995                                  






                                                           REJECTION                                                               
                                                                2                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007