Ex Parte MOLNAR et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2001-0906                                                                                                 
               Application No. 08/597,073                                                                                           


                       Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                   
                       1.  A method for estimating a position of a terminal in a radiocommunication system using                    
               an array to illuminate areas with spot beams, comprising the steps of:                                               
                       measuring a received power associated with each of a plurality of said spot beams;                           
                       determining relative powers associated with said received power by comparing said                            
               measured, received powers with a reference power; and                                                                
                       estimating said position of said terminal using said relative powers and a model of spot beam                
               shape.                                                                                                               
                       The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                
               Hutcheson et al. (Hutcheson)                   5,551,058                      Aug. 27, 1996                          
                                                                                             (filed Oct. 31, 1994)                  
               Hutcheson et al. (Hutcheson)                   5,551,059                      Aug. 27, 1996                          
                                                                                             (filed Oct. 31, 1994)                  
               Olds et al. (Olds)                             5,905,443                      May 18, 1999                           
                                                                             (effective filing date Oct.  2, 1995)                  
                       Claims 1 through 7, 11, 12, 16 through 19, 21 through 23 and 27 through 29 stand rejected                    
               under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hutcheson ‘058 in view of Olds.                                  
                       Claims 9, 10, 14 and 24 through 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                          
               unpatentable over Hutcheson ‘058 in view of Olds and Hutcheson ‘059.                                                 
                       Reference is made to the supplemental brief (paper number 21) and the answer (paper                          
               number 23) for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                                          




                                                              OPINION                                                               
                                                                 2                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007