Appeal No. 2001-0910 Application No. 08/903,756 DeSimone as discussed supra. Further, since the Examiner has, in our view, improperly interpreted the disclosure of DeSimone, the issue of the obviousness of these features has not been addressed. In summary, we have not sustained the Examiner’s rejections of any of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-23 is reversed. REVERSED LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JFR:hh 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007