Ex Parte FUCHS et al - Page 4




         Appeal No. 2001-0936                                                       
         Application No. 08/952,208                                                 
         aminocapronitrile and 0.01% of a tetrahydroazepine with water in           
         the liquid phase in the presence of a heterogeneous catalyst.              
         The invention also relates to a process for the preparation of             
         caprolactam which involves reacting a tetrahydroazepine with               
         water in the liquid phase in the presence of a heterogeneous               
         catalyst.  (Claims 1 and 13).                                              
                                    DISPOSITION                                     
         I.   The Rejection of Claims 1, 3-6 and 10-16 Under 35 U.S.C.              
              § 112,first paragraph                                                 
              The examiner has stated that the disclosure is not enabling.          
         More specifically, the examiner has stated that the starting               
         material which is critical or essential to the practice of the             
         invention, but is not included in the claims, is not enabled by            
         the disclosure.  The examiner states that no sources of the                
         tetrahydroazepine of formula I (THA-I) have been provided.  The            
         examples, it is said, show production of THA-I by heating                  
         aminocapronitrile, but as the claims include sources by any other          
         means, enablement is lacking. (Examiner’s Answer, page 3, lines            
         4-15).                                                                     
              The enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. §112, first                   
         paragraph, requires that the patent specification enable “those            
         skilled in the art to make and use the full scope of the claimed           
         invention without ‘undue experimentation’” Genentech, Inc. v.              

                                         4                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007