The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ROBERT E. GARFIELD and KRISTOF CHWALISZ __________ Appeal No. 2001-0982 Application No. 08/310,950 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before SCHEINER, ADAMS and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-23, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claims 1 and 16 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are reproduced below: 1. A method of treatment selected from the group consisting of (a) preventing or treating atherosclerotic vascular disease in a mammal; b) hormone replacement therapy in a peri- or post-menopausal female mammal; and c) treating hypertension in a mammal, which comprises administering to the afflicted mammal an amount of prostacyclin or prostacyclin analog in combination with one or more of an estrogen and a progestin, in amounts effective to ameliorate or prevent the appearance of the symptoms thereof, wherein said amounts are synergistically effective and the amounts of prostacyclin, prostacyclin analog, estrogen or progesterone are individually ineffective or marginally effective.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007