The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 49 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAMES R. WOODRUFF and PETER J. HESKETH ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1055 Application No. 08/651,927 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRETT, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 9, 11 through 17, 20, 22 through 32, 34, and 35. Claim 10 has been allowed. Claims 18, 19, 21, and 33 have been canceled. Appellants' invention relates to a method and apparatus for detecting and measuring forces with mechanical resonators. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007