Ex Parte WOODRUFF et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1055                                                        
          Application No. 08/651,927                                                  


               1.   A vibrating beam force transducer for an accelerometer            
          comprising:                                                                 
               at least a first vibrating beam having a longitudinal axis,            
          first and second fixed end portions and a resonating portion                
          therebetween, said resonating portion defining a lateral wall and           
          having one or more fingers formed substantially coplanar with               
          said beam and projecting from said lateral wall; and                        
               an electrode positioned adjacent to and spaced from said               
          beam for generating an electrostatic force to vibrate said                  
          resonating portion of said beam in a transverse direction, said             
          electrode having one or more fingers extending toward said                  
          resonating portion of said beam.                                            
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Tang et al. (Tang)              5,025,346           Jun. 18, 1991           
          Kulcke et al. (Kulcke)          DE 4424635          Jan. 18, 1996           
          (German patent)                                                             
               Claims 1 through 4, 7, 9, 11 through 15, 17, 22 through 25,            
          28, 31, and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as being             
          anticipated by Kulcke.                                                      
               Claims 5, 6, 20, 29, 30, 32, and 35 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kulcke.                       
               Claims 8, 16, 26, and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kulcke in view of Tang.                 
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 44,              
          mailed December 7, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning in           
          support of the rejections, and to appellants' Brief (Paper No.              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007