Ex Parte BESSER et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2001-1090                                                                                                 
               Application No. 09/477,821                                                                                           


                       Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                   
                       1.      A method of manufacturing an electrical device, which method comprises the                           
               sequential steps of:                                                                                                 
                       (a) providing a substrate including at least one metal feature in-laid in the upper, exposed                 
               surface of a layer of dielectric material overlying at least a portion of said substrate, the at least one           
               metal feature including an upper, exposed surface substantially co-planar with said upper surface of                 
               said layer of dielectric material;                                                                                   
                       (b) selectively depositing at least one layer comprising at least one alloying element for said              
               metal feature on said exposed, upper surface of said at least one metal feature; and                                 
                       (c) annealing to substantially uniformly diffuse at least a predetermined minimum amount of                  
               said at least one alloying element from said at least one layer comprising said at least one alloying                
               element into said at least one metal feature for at least a predetermined minimum depth below the                    
               upper surface thereof, whereby electromigration of metal of said at least one metal feature is                       
               minimized or substantially prevented.                                                                                
                       The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                
               Chiu et al. (Chiu)                             4,335,506                      June 22, 1982                          
               Chow et al. (Chow)                             4,789,648                      Dec.   6, 1988                         
               Kondo et al. (Kondo)                           6,001,736                      Dec. 14, 1999                          
               Nogami et al. (Nogami)                         6,022,808                      Feb.   8, 2000                         
                                                                                     (filed Mar. 16, 1998)                          
                       Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                       
               Nogami in view of Chow, Chiu and Kondo.                                                                              
                       Reference is made to the briefs (paper numbers 10 and 12) and the answer (paper number                       
               11) for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                                                 





                                                                 2                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007