Ex Parte PORUBEK et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                                                                                              Paper No. 49                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                     __________                                                            

                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                      __________                                                           
                                              Ex parte DAVID PORUBEK,                                                      
                                                 ANIL M. KUMAR, and                                                        
                                                 CHARLES R. BREDL                                                          
                                                      ___________                                                          
                                                 Appeal No. 2001-1101                                                      
                                              Application No. 08/932,834                                                   
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                      __________                                                           
              Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
              WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        
                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                     This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7,                    
              9, 10, 12 through 16, 18 through 21, and 23 through 27, which are all of the claims                          
              remaining in the application.                                                                                


                                                      The Invention                                                        
                     The invention relates to compounds that form the hydroxy-substituted zanthine,                        
              lisofylline, in vivo.  These compounds, or prodrugs, are said to possess a primary,                          
              characteristic benefit, viz., selective enantiomeric stability coupled with varying                          






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007