The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 49 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DAVID PORUBEK, ANIL M. KUMAR, and CHARLES R. BREDL ___________ Appeal No. 2001-1101 Application No. 08/932,834 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12 through 16, 18 through 21, and 23 through 27, which are all of the claims remaining in the application. The Invention The invention relates to compounds that form the hydroxy-substituted zanthine, lisofylline, in vivo. These compounds, or prodrugs, are said to possess a primary, characteristic benefit, viz., selective enantiomeric stability coupled with varyingPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007