Appeal No. 2001-1101 Page 9
Application No. 08/932,834
Conclusion
In conclusion, for reasons set forth in the body of this opinion, we sustain the
examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18 through 21, and 23
through 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.
We do not reach the merits of the "how to use" rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, with respect to claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18 through 21,
and 23 through 27.
We do not sustain the examiner's rejection of claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph.
The examiner's decision is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
)
Sherman D. Winters )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
William F. Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
Lora M. Green )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007