The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte AMIT GUPTA, ISRAEL CIDON and RAPHAEL ROM ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1123 Application No. 08/990,759 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 15, 17 and 19 through 33. The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus for selectively communicating via either a connectionless protocol or a connection oriented protocol. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1. Apparatus for engaging in communications, comprising: a. a communications interface; and b. a processor, connected to said communications interface and configured to initiatePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007