Appeal No. 2001-1123
Application No. 08/990,759
The obviousness rejection of claim 31 is reversed because the applied references neither
teach nor would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art “substantially simultaneously
storing state information needed for a connection using Transaction TCP (T/TCP).”
DECISION
The anticipation rejection made by the examiner is affirmed as to claims 1, 3, 4, 8, 10
through 12, 15, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 29 and 32, and is reversed as to claims 13, 14, 21 and 26.
The obviousness rejection made by the examiner is affirmed as to claims 2, 5 through 7, 9 and 30,
and is reversed as to claims 17, 23, 28, 31 and 33. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is
affirmed-in-part.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007