Appeal No. 2001-1186 Application No. 08/819,609 In summary, with respect to the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of the appealed claims, we have not sustained the rejection of claims 1-15, 17, and 18, but have sustained the rejection of claims 16, 19, and 20. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-20 is affirmed-in-part. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JFR:hh 455, 458 n.2, 150 USPQ 441, 444 n.2 (CCPA 1966). 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007