The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte REMO PARESCHI,
NATALIE S. GLANCE,
DANIELE PAGANI,
JEAN-MARC ANDREOLI,
STEFANIA CASTELLANI,
and
GUNNAR TEEGE
_____________
Appeal No. 2001-1204
Application No. 08/971,021
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 3, 5, 6, 8 through 11, 13 through 16, 18 and 20.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
for generating a representation of a work process in a memory of
a data processing system.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007