Ex Parte PARESCHI et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1204                                                        
          Application No. 08/971,021                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    1.  A method for generating a representation of a work            
               process in a memory of a data processing system, comprising            
               the steps of:                                                          

                    receiving a first user input and a second user input;             
                         the first user input indicating a first object and           
                    a second object; the first object and the second object           
                    each having a set of features; the first object                   
                    specifying an activity for creating a document; the               
                    second object specifying a state of the document for              
                    initiating the activity;                                          
                         the second user input indicating a plurality of              
                    rules for defining a relationship between the first               
                    object and the second object; the plurality of rules              
                    including a constraint to be satisfied by a feature of            
                    the first object and a feature of the second object in            
                    a manner that specifies the activity and the document             
                    are duals of each other; and                                      
                    compiling, in the memory, a grammar representing the              
               work process; said compiling step generating the grammar               
               from the plurality of rules indicated by the second user               
               input.                                                                 
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Srinivasan               5,548,506                Aug. 20, 1996             
          Ivanov                   5,706,452           Jan.  6, 1998                  
                                             (filed Dec.  6, 1995)                    
               Claims 1 through 3, 5, 6, 8 through 11, 13 through 16,                 
          18 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                  
          unpatentable over Srinivasan in view of Ivanov.                             

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007