Appeal No. 2001-1209 Application No. 09/106,281 In summary, with respect to the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejections of the appealed claims, we have sustained the rejection of claims 2-4 and 6-9, but have not sustained the rejection of claim 5. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 2-9 is affirmed-in-part. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) jfr/vsh 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007