Ex Parte HOEGER et al - Page 2


                 Appeal No.  2001-1218                                                       Page 2                   
                 Application No.  08/727,798                                                                          

                 22. A peptide intermediate for making a GnRH antagonist peptide which                                
                 intermediate has the formula: Ac-AA1-(A)D-Phe-AA3-Ser(X3)-AA5(Xa)-D-AA6(Xa)-                         
                 Leu-Lys(Ipr,X6)-Pro-D-Ala-NH-resin support, wherein AA1 is β-D-NAL, (A)D-Phe                         
                 or (B)D-Trp; A is H, 4Cl, 4F, 4NO2, 4CH3, 4OCH3, CaMe/4Cl,  2, 4 Cl2 or 4Br; B is                    
                 H, 6NO2, 6NH2, 6OCH3, 6F, 6Cl, 6Br, 6CH3, 1Acetyl or 1Formyl; AA3 is D-PAL,                          
                 β-D-NAL or (B)D-Trp; AA5 is Lys, aminoPhe, Orn, Dbu, or Dpr; D-AA6 IS D-Lys,                         
                 D- aminoPhe, D-Orn, D-Dbu or D-Dpr; X3 is hydrogen or a protecting group for a                       
                 hydroxyl group of Ser; Xa is a protecting group for a side chain primary amino                       
                 group which protecting group is base-labile, hydrazine-labile or thio-labile; and X6                 
                 is benzylcarbonyl or 2-chlorobenzyloxycarbonyl.                                                      

                        The examiner relies upon the following references:                                            
                        Rivier et al. (Rivier)             4,569,927           Feb. 11, 1986                          
                        Folkers et al. (Folkers)           4,935,491           Jun. 19, 1990                          
                        Hoeger et al.                     5,169,932           Dec. 08, 1992                          
                        Hoeger et al.                     5,296,468           Mar. 22, 1994                          
                        Webb et al. (Webb)          EP 0,057,564               Aug. 11, 1982                          
                 (European Patent)                                                                                    

                        Claims 19-27 stand rejected under the judicially created doctrine of                          
                 obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-3 and                          
                 5-25 of U.S. Patent No. 5,296,468 (the ’468 patent) and claims 1-7 of U.S.                           
                 Patent No. 5,169,932 (the ’932 patent).  Claim 22 stands rejected under                              
                 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Folkers.  Claims 19-20 and 22 stand                       
                 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the combination of Rivier and                         
                 Folkers, and claims 21 and 23-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                          
                 being rendered obvious by the above combination as further combined with                             
                 Webb.  After careful review of the record and consideration of the issues before                     
                 us, we reverse all of the rejections of record.                                                      








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007