Appeal No. 2001-1218 Page 2 Application No. 08/727,798 22. A peptide intermediate for making a GnRH antagonist peptide which intermediate has the formula: Ac-AA1-(A)D-Phe-AA3-Ser(X3)-AA5(Xa)-D-AA6(Xa)- Leu-Lys(Ipr,X6)-Pro-D-Ala-NH-resin support, wherein AA1 is β-D-NAL, (A)D-Phe or (B)D-Trp; A is H, 4Cl, 4F, 4NO2, 4CH3, 4OCH3, CaMe/4Cl, 2, 4 Cl2 or 4Br; B is H, 6NO2, 6NH2, 6OCH3, 6F, 6Cl, 6Br, 6CH3, 1Acetyl or 1Formyl; AA3 is D-PAL, β-D-NAL or (B)D-Trp; AA5 is Lys, aminoPhe, Orn, Dbu, or Dpr; D-AA6 IS D-Lys, D- aminoPhe, D-Orn, D-Dbu or D-Dpr; X3 is hydrogen or a protecting group for a hydroxyl group of Ser; Xa is a protecting group for a side chain primary amino group which protecting group is base-labile, hydrazine-labile or thio-labile; and X6 is benzylcarbonyl or 2-chlorobenzyloxycarbonyl. The examiner relies upon the following references: Rivier et al. (Rivier) 4,569,927 Feb. 11, 1986 Folkers et al. (Folkers) 4,935,491 Jun. 19, 1990 Hoeger et al. 5,169,932 Dec. 08, 1992 Hoeger et al. 5,296,468 Mar. 22, 1994 Webb et al. (Webb) EP 0,057,564 Aug. 11, 1982 (European Patent) Claims 19-27 stand rejected under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-3 and 5-25 of U.S. Patent No. 5,296,468 (the ’468 patent) and claims 1-7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,169,932 (the ’932 patent). Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Folkers. Claims 19-20 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the combination of Rivier and Folkers, and claims 21 and 23-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being rendered obvious by the above combination as further combined with Webb. After careful review of the record and consideration of the issues before us, we reverse all of the rejections of record.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007