Appeal No. 2001-1293 Page 2 Application No. 08/464,271 said method comprising administering to said organism an amount of said latent toxin effective to trigger generation of said cell toxin by enzymatic conversion of the latent toxin; thereby selectively inhibiting growth or causing death of at least a substantial portion of said tissue-type or cell line. 38. A method according to Claim 42 wherein said exogenous enzyme is selected from non-mammalian enzymes that catalyze the conversion of the latent toxin into a cell toxin for said cell line. 40. A method according to Claim 39 wherein said viral enzyme is herpes simplex thymidine kinase. The examiner relies on the following references: Ledley, “Somatic gene therapy for human disease: Background and prospects. Part I,” The Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 110, pp. 1-8 (1987) Kappel et al. (Kappel), ”Regulating gene expression in transgenic animals,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Vol. 3, pp. 548-553 (1992) Mullen, “Metabolic suicide genes in gene therapy,” Pharmac. Ther., Vol. 63, pp. 199-207 (1994) Claims 3-8, 12, 29, 31-41, 44, and 45 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as nonenabled. We affirm in part. Background The specification discloses a method of “establishing stable transgenic cell populations and then selectively ablating (i.e., negatively selecting for) specific cell types and/or cell lineages in such transgenic cell populations at desired stages of development or differentiation.” Page 1. According to the invention method, (C) cells that express exogenous gene (G) and thus contain enzyme (E) within the transgenic cell population, when exposed to a specific latent toxin, i.e., non-toxic drug substance that enzyme (E) converts into aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007