Ex Parte EVANS et al - Page 9


                 Appeal No. 2001-1293                                                         Page 9                    
                 Application No. 08/464,271                                                                             

                        The state of the prior art does not appear to contribute significantly to the                   
                 enabling scope of the disclosure.  Mullen discusses “metabolic suicide genes”                          
                 which appear to meet the criteria recited in the claims.  However, Mullen was                          
                 published in 1994, while the instant application claims an effective filing date at                    
                 least as early as 1990.  Thus, Mullen’s disclosure does not appear to reflect the                      
                 state of the art as of the relevant date.  See Hybritech, Inc. v. Monoclonal                           
                 Antibodies, Inc., 802 F.2d 1367, 1384, 231 USPQ 81, 94 (Fed. Cir. 1987)                                
                 (“Enablement . . . is determined as of the filing date of the patent application.”).                   
                        In addition, Mullen identifies only three metabolic suicide gene systems,                       
                 one of which is the HSV-TK system.  The other systems discussed by Mullen are                          
                 the cytosine deaminase system and the varicella thymidine kinase system.  With                         
                 one exception, the references cited by Mullen with respect to these other enzyme                       
                 systems were all published after 1990.  The only exception concerns a “non-                            
                 genetic” approach of coupling cytosine deaminase enzyme to a tumor-specific                            
                 antibody; an approach very different from the claimed method.  Thus, the prior art                     
                 of record does not reflect that other DNAs encoding enzymes meeting the                                
                 limitations of the instant claims were known in the art as of the application’s                        
                 effective filing date.                                                                                 
                        The examiner has provided evidence that expression of transgenes was                            
                 unpredictable.  See the Examiner’s Answer, pages 5 and 6.  This evidence is                            
                 relevant here, where no other genes encompassed by the claims have been                                
                 exemplified, or even identified.  The examiner’s evidence shows that the                               
                 disclosed success with HSV-TK in mice would not have been viewed by those in                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007