Appeal No. 2001-1340 Application 08/944,885 Since the claims on appeal recite functions which are not disclosed by Hogan, the rejection of the claims on appeal as being anticipated by Hogan is not sustained. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 and 3-6 is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/llf John C. Hammar The Boeing Company 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007