Ex Parte CHENG et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2001-1421                                                        
          Application No. 09/128,226                                                  


               forming a plurality of bumps on the pads, wherein the bumps            
          have a first height and an air space is naturally formed between            
          sides of the bumps and the passivation layer;                               
               coating a first underfill material layer over the first                
          semiconductor substrate at least filling the air space, wherein a           
          thickness of the first underfill material layer is less than the            
          first height of the bumps;                                                  
               performing a die sawing process on the first semiconductor             
          substrate to from [sic, form] a plurality of dies; and                      
               performing a flip-chip process on each of the dies to adhere           
          each of the dies to a second substrate.                                     
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Goossen        5,975,408                        Nov. 02, 1999               
                         (filed Oct. 23, 1997)                                        
          Charles A. Harper (Harper), “Electronic Packaging and                       
          Interconnection Handbook,” (Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New                
          York) 5.52-5.53 and 10.29-10.34 (1997).                                     
               Claims 1-15 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Goossen in view of Harper.                       
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs1 and Answer for their             
          respective details.                                                         




               1 The Appeal Brief was filed September 11, 2000 (Paper No. 9).  In     
          response to the Examiner’s Answer dated October 24, 2000 (Paper No. 10), a  
          Reply Brief was filed December 26, 2000 (Paper No. 11), which was acknowledged
          and entered by the Examiner as indicated in the communication dated January 
          18, 2001 (Paper No. 12).                                                    
                                         -3–3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007