THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 45
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KAZUYA AKASHI, KAZUO ENOMOTO, NAOKI GOSHIMA,
KENICHIROU TAKAHASHI, HIDEKI KAWAMURA,
TAKESHI HASEGAWA, YASUO TAKEMURA,
HIDETAKA YAMAZAKI
and ATSUSHI HAMADA
_____________
Appeal No. 2001-1454
Application 08/412,118
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 18-21, 23, 24 and 26-37, which constitute all the claims remaining in
the application. An amendment after final rejection was filed on April 18, 2000 and was
entered by the examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007